<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank You, for 1,000 hits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthebema.com/2009/06/23/thank-you-for-1000-hits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthebema.com/2009/06/23/thank-you-for-1000-hits/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:43:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Smith</title>
		<link>http://onthebema.com/2009/06/23/thank-you-for-1000-hits/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthebemainballston.wordpress.com/?p=348#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Alan.  This is what I had written you about.  Given the nature of the ABCUSA biennial, where few critical decisions are made by the assembly, is there any hope that this policy can get reversed, or at least sent back to BIM for review?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Alan.  This is what I had written you about.  Given the nature of the ABCUSA biennial, where few critical decisions are made by the assembly, is there any hope that this policy can get reversed, or at least sent back to BIM for review?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
